Free Edition of Corporate High School for Public School Libraries, Classrooms, and Public Libraries

CHS 2021 eBook cover 3_26_21.jpg

I am a high school English teacher. During Covid, the school where I teach (shout-out to Central High School, no relation to the CHS in this novel) discovered a lot more students wanted to read eBooks than had previously been the case. Maybe some of you like reading on your phones. Maybe you’ve gotten used to staring at screens during the pandemic. Regardless, we found that the cost of those eBooks really added up. And here I am, the author of a book that’s all about how we need to fight back and defend public schools against the increasing attacks from those who see them as a source of corporate profit. I didn’t want this novel to be a burden on public schools (or public libraries which are also essential for protecting the people of a democracy). So I worked it out with my publishing company to provide this edition for free for public schools and public libraries. (There’s a nice advantage to being the co-publisher of the company: I only had to check with my co-publisher, Viveca Shearin, and no one else could stop us. Thanks, Viveca!) We know some people outside of public schools and libraries might sneak a copy or two. We decided it’s worth it. I hope you enjoy this book. It was a ton of fun to write. And there’s a lesson there: Standing up for you believe in isn’t always enjoyable. You get push-back, and sometimes that push-back can be awful. But sometimes taking a stand is a blast! You don’t do it for the party, but there’s nothing wrong with enjoying those bright moments when they come. I hope this book will be a bright moment for you, too.

Trigger warnings: There’s some challenging material in this book. There’s a scene of an attempted sexual assault. There are references to people experiencing homophobia and racism. There’s one pretty graphic description of a beating. And there are lots of references to environmental disasters that will likely be the consequences of global climate change. I tried to handle these events in the story with care. I think the book is completely appropriate for most high school students and even more mature middle school students, but students who have experienced some of these traumas should be forewarned. There is a balance to be found between accurately depicting the horrors of the world, even an imaginary one, and exaggerating those horrors to make a point. I tried to find that balance, but it’s impossible to know exactly where it is for every reader. So please know there is no shame in closing a book if the content gets to be too much for you. You are more important than anything on a screen. Take care of yourself.

The free edition of the eBook is available for public school libraries, classrooms, and public libraries HERE.

High School English Teacher Confession

Okay, everybody, I'm going to let you in on a little secret about high school teachers. Or maybe just high school English teachers. Or maybe just me. We grouse about our middle school and elementary colleagues. (Or maybe I'm the only one, and other English teachers just nod politely while I do it. Is it just me?) "Why didn't anyone teach these kids how to use a comma by ninth grade? How did this kid get to me without learning to use a period at the end of a sentence? There, their, and they're; it's not that hard!" Here's another secret: My middle school and elementary colleagues did teach them. They taught them these lessons over and over and over and over (and over). It's not their fault. It's mostly developmental. These concepts just click at different times for different kids.

But here's something else about high school teachers, or maybe just high school English teachers, or maybe just me: We don't thank our middle school and elementary colleagues enough. Well, I just got through a huge stack of essays, and I want to very publicly say THANK YOU! Thank you to the teachers at Talmadge Middle School and Independence Elementary School and Ash Creek Elementary School and Monmouth Elementary School. And thanks to the great Educational Assistants at Central High School who have been working with my kids who are on IEPs or who are second-language learners. Because my kids are writing with more technical proficiency than perhaps any class I've had before. Whatever y'all are doing, keep it up!

And to the folx out there who are saying, "None of the kids are learning anything this year," sit down. First, that simply wrong. The kids are learning a lot! They are living through something none of my other students had to weather, and they're still learning, so please stop telling them they aren't. They can hear you! Also, when you say things like, "They're falling behind," I'd like to know who you think they're falling behind. Are there children living on the International Space Station I'm unaware of? Because last I heard, this is a GLOBAL pandemic. Do you really think Harvard is going to say, "Nope, we just won't accept any students for the next 12 years because they all had a bumpy year during that GLOBAL FREAKING PANDEMIC?!" Your kids are rock stars. Take them out for ice cream. (Use the drive through and wear a mask. The person scooping the ice cream and leaning out the window to hand the ice cream to you is a person, and decent people wear masks to protect other people.) Your kids deserve ice cream.

And I know this has been incredibly rough on you, too. Most of the negativity directed at our schools and teachers and, yes, even our kids is just frustration looking for a target. I get it. Pandemics are not fun. So get yourself some ice cream, too. You deserve it. Even those of you who have been particularly nasty to the very people working so hard for your kids. You just haven't learned how to productively direct your frustration. I feel you. I sometimes do the same thing. I'm working on it. I recommend ice cream.

Last, to my high school colleagues who will get these ninth graders next year: Hold onto your butts! We've got some dang good writers coming your way. And the students got those skills from the people I used to complain about. Remind me of this the next time I'm grousing.

1200px-SageGrouse21.jpg

Today in Ben's hate mail:

Today in Ben's hate mail:

"@elcooterbubba: Don’t reproduce, we have enough 3’s in this world"

First: Mr. Cooter-Bubba, this message is a comma splice. It should be two different sentences, or it could be joined with a semicolon, a coordinating conjunction, or a subordinating conjunction without the comma.

Second: You need some end punctuation at the end of that second sentence ... once you turn it into a second sentence.

Third: Too late! I have a child (only one that I'm aware of), he's amazing, and the world has far too few people like him, so I really ought to have had more. Also, I'm snipped so this is not useful advice anymore.

Fourth: What is your rating scale? 3 out of 10? I can accept that. 3 out of 100? That's a bit harsh, but calling for the sterilization of 3% of the world's population still seems high. 3s at different events? I would be proud to be a bronze medalist. This is unclear.

Fifth: Numbers do not require apostrophes even when pluralized in this way. They still don't own anything, so they aren't possessives. For example, when you decide you need some extra large tires for your truck in order to feel better about ... things, you'll be purchasing some 265s, not 265's. The tires don't own you. They just help with your issues. Find your bliss. But punctuate properly.

Sixth: I appreciate the feedback. It helps me grow. Next time, please provide something actionable so I can improve. Have a wonderful day, and call your parents to thank Ms. Bubba and Mr. Cooter for raising such a delightful human.

Inclusion in A Critical Conversation

Logo for A Critical Conversation by Claire Osborn

Logo for A Critical Conversation by Claire Osborn

When I was asked if some of my poetry could be included in an art exhibit that focuses on the intersections of art, race, and privilege, my first response was one I expect most artists can identify with. My impostor syndrome flared up like a gas can held too close to the fire. I thought, “My work doesn’t belong there. That’s for real artists.” I wasn’t reacting that way because they wanted to include poetry in the exhibit. I thought that kind of interdisciplinary inclusion was a feature, a kind of metaphor for the interracial conversation the show is all about. But even then, shouldn’t they find real poets?

My next reaction was more pragmatic. I did not want to be a part of the kinds of conversations about race I’ve heard about at some conventions, where a panel of white artists tell a predominantly white audience about racism. I told the curator, artist Kathleen Caprario, that my role, as a cishet white man who wants to learn to be a better ally, is to be a signal booster and promote the voices of traditionally marginalized people. I told her I wouldn’t feel comfortable taking a spot from a person of color. She appreciated that and included Lydia K. Valentine, a poet I greatly admire and think of as a real poet. But Kathleen told me she wanted to create the kind of conversation that would include a cishet white male voice, also. To Kathleen’s credit, the artists included in the exhibition are very diverse, far more than is representative of the demographics of Oregon, the most historically racially exclusionary state in the US. Last night Kathleen hosted a party (online because that’s where we all live now), and I got to hear from some of the artists about their work and the questions they were posing through it. I was a bit star-struck by their insight and creativity, and I am honored to have my work close to theirs. I want to send a heartfelt thanks to Kathleen Caprario and Gregory S. Black who created the exhibit, Eugene Contemporary Arts where it is displayed, the supporters of the arts who have made it possible, and, more than anything, to the other artists who didn’t hook a finger in my direction and say, “What the hell is this guy doing here?”

The exhibit is open from Jan 14 – March 21, 2021 and is on display online as well as in person, so check out their amazing work HERE. There will also be opportunities to come view it live, including some demonstrations of some of the art being created (make an appointment HERE), and there will be online panel discussions with some of the artists announced on their website HERE.

November Newsletter: Dancing one The Ashes

To sign up to receive this newsletter in your email each month, go HERE

Dancind on the Ashes.jpg

Dear Handsome and Clever Readers with Perspicacious Taste in Newsletters,

Some good news and cool opportunities I want to share with you!

When+She+Leaves+Me+ebook+cover+10_18_20.jpg

Yesterday my fifth book launched. I know I should have mentioned in it a previous newsletter, but this book is so personal that I have trouble plugging it. Why, you ask, would he release a book he’s not comfortable plugging? This book is a collection of the poems I wrote in the immediate aftermath of my ex revealing that she never really loved me and announcing she was leaving me, continuing through to the point where I started feeling the first glimmers of hope that my life would go on. I felt compelled to share the poetry with the world because I suspect there are people out there who might connect and maybe even take some comfort in the shared experience, but being this transparent feels dangerous. After deciding to publish, I treated my own anxiety by telling myself very few people would read it. I told a friend I expected it to sell four copies, two of which would be read. Instead, it became an Amazon bestseller on the first day. To my surprise, this felt really good, thanks to some readers who reached out and told me it had exactly the effect I’d hoped. So I’m letting you all know. If poetry is your thing, When She Leaves Me is available now, here: https://bit.ly/WhenShe

This Saturday, November 28th, at 5pm, I’ll be participating in a reading with two other poets, Lydia K. Valentine (Brief Black Candles) and Zack Dye (21st Century American Verses). The event is hosted by Not a Pipe Publishing and co-sponsored by bookstores Third Place Books, The Neverending Bookshop, and Books on B, and writers organizations Portland Ars Poetica, the Oregon Poetry Association, and Writers in Town. You can register for the event here, and Not a Pipe Publishing will send you the Zoom link for the event: https://bit.ly/TFPMonth

Saturday, December 19th, I’ll be participating in Jolabokaflod PDX. Jolabokaflod is an Icelandic tradition in which people give one another books on Christmas Eve and then read together. Authors Margaret Pinard and Elizabeth Mitchell created a version of this in Portland to connect local authors and readers. This year it’s all online, and I’ll be on a couple of panels: “Writing YA in a World of Identity, Sexuality, and Violence: How Much Is Too Much? – Michaela Thorn, Debby Dodds, Karen Eisenbrey, Kate Ristau, and Benjamin Gorman” and “The Year of Publishing Women – Sang Kromah, LeeAnn McLennan, Mikko Azul, Heather S. Ransom, and Benjamin Gorman” but there are a ton of other great offerings as well, so check out the whole schedule here: https://jolabokaflodpdx.com/

 

Monday, December 21st: The Writing Against the Darkness team, a group of writers who raise money to fight Alzheimer’s through The Alzheimer’s Association’s annual The Longest Day fundraiser, is getting started early this year. Normally we build up to the annual event on the summer solstice, then get together that day (online and in person, though it will all be online this year, of course), and write from dawn till dusk. This year we’re going to have a dress rehearsal on the shortest day of the year, the winter solstice. It’s a much easier lift to try to write on the shortest day, and we can start our fundraising efforts and hopefully remind more people that they can join the team. So if you would like to join us, we would love to have you. All kinds of writing and all writers are welcome! 

http://www.notapipepublishing.com/blog/2020/11/5/writing-against-the-darkness-will-be-writing-on-winter-solstice

Monthly Poem

I may not have been very good at maintaining a monthly newsletter, but I’m remaining pretty consistent at writing poetry, so here’s one that fits the season well. 

Gratitude in 2020

The liquid soap

on the dishes

is just green goo until

churned, it becomes bubbles

and people keep popping up

on my phone 

excited by isolation.


Vicky, the poet, talks about

sharing and gives me a prompt

and Eleanor, the writer, says,

"I'm not bailing on what I've got, but just

whew … I've reached for

someone else's dream, it feels like"

and Jessica, a tired new mom,

tells me about her son's meltdown but

she pluralizes to

"We are tired and want to be held"


That's the year.

When the country discovered its

deeper rot in the middle

of a plague and only barely

tossed out the dictator after

so much damage

and so many standing

with signs that really said

"We are tired and want to be held"


and Thanksgiving could be

obligatory and false except

I'm grateful

for all the bubbles



Sign off

I’ll keep sending you flowers every day (digitally, through Instagram and twitter and FB) to try to bring some added beauty into your life. But don’t let anyone tell you how you have to feel this holiday season, including me. If you don’t feel hopeful, you aren’t obligated. Take care of yourself in whatever way you need to right now. I’m pulling for you.

-Ben

Celebrating Survival

Tonight I attended the launch party for Lydia K. Valentine’s beautiful book of poetry, Brief Black Candles. She had 113 people in attendance! One of the things she talked about was the way her father would welcome people into their family, saying, “You’re a Roberts” to non-blood relatives. I have long been a believer that family is the people we love, so this really spoke to me. And it made me reflect on the way the launch of my next book will be very different from my novels. In addition to my blood relatives, I have a wonderful family of people I’ve adopted, and people who have adopted me, and I know many of you all would be there to celebrate this next book’s launch if I asked. But it’s such a strange kind of celebration I would be asking you to attend.

When She Leaves Me ebook cover 10_18_20.jpg

Inviting people to celebrate the launch of When She Leaves Me would feel a bit like asking people to come to my own personalized version of a party to celebrate an asteroid striking the Yucatan Peninsula and wiping out the dinosaurs. Two years ago, my life exploded, but it did so in stages. First, I found out my marriage had been built on a lie. Then I foolishly fought to maintain that marriage anyway. I tried to live in the debris of the explosion for a while. Then that failed. Slowly (ever so slowly), I crawled out from the fallen trees and discovered the ashes in the sky were thinning. Slowly. So slowly. This book is not about some magical, complete recovery. I am a diminished person compared to the man I was two years ago. I’ve learned a lot about myself, but most of it is humbling and not-at-all flattering. I made a choice to include poems in the collection that revealed me to be angry, sometimes petty, often melancholy, frequently pathetic, and generally not a great guy to be around the last couple years. It’s odd to celebrate sharing that.

And yet, you are reading this because, for millions of years, small mammals like me survived. And we survived in community with one another. So, while I won’t be throwing a traditional launch party (or a non-traditional online version), I do want to thank you all for your support over the last couple of years. To paraphrase Lydia’s father, you all are family. I once heard Oregon’s poet laureate Kim Stafford talk about how poetry is about making connections in a very immediate way because it can be written so quickly. My novels take years to write. I’m sure part of the reason I turned to poetry during this time in my life was because I needed immediate communication with you, my family. Collecting that need two years later, when I’m no longer in the place I was in when this book ends, loses some of that benefit for me, explaining my reluctance to promote this book as much as I should, but I hope the work retains that benefit for you; I hope you’ll feel that reaching out in every poem and recognize it as a sign of my gratitude for you. Maybe survival is a small thing to celebrate, but I’m glad I get to survive with all of you.

Contest Announcement: Is Donald Trump the Biggest Liar Ever?

Trump.jpg

This could be fun! Let’s make a game of it. I believe Donald Trump has told more documented lies than any human being ever. I could be wrong about this. One of the big problems with our politics is that people are unwilling to learn they are wrong and admit it. So I’m going to challenge anyone who wants to participate: Show me I’m wrong. Not only will I admit it, I will pay you for teaching me. I will send you a free, signed copy of one of my novels and a $25 Visa gift card (in the hopes that you’ll like my book and choose to use the gift card to buy another from your locally owned independent bookstore 😁). I’m paying you to prove me wrong.

Rules: Be the first to provide me with the name of someone who has told more lies than Donald Trump, and provide a link to documentation that this individual has told more than 20,000 lies, and you win. I’ll DM you to get the address where you want me to send your book and Visa Gift Card. It’s that easy.

But! (And this is on your honor) if you can’t think of anyone, spread the word about this contest. Share the post or tweet or link to the blog. Ask your friends. If you are a Trump supporter, try to get help from other Trump supporters. If you have a celebrity you know who might want to share this and even sweeten the pot with a prize of their own, ask them to participate. If you know someone in the media, ask them to cover the story of the contest. Because this is more than a game. This matters. 

Here’s the thing: I have asked Trump supporters this question before. Can they name me anyone, not just a President or a politician by ANYONE, who has ever told as many documented lies as Donald Trump. Here’s what I get back: 

  • Absurd guesses based on partisanship rather than evidence. “Obama!” “Clinton!” Not even close, and they can’t ever find any documentation for those claims. 

  • Or both-sides-ism. “All politicians lie.” Perhaps, but that’s as logical as answering “What does 2+2=?” with “All math questions have answers.” Trivially true but not going to get you far in a math class. 

  • Or what-about-ism. “What about Benghazi?” Again, trying to shift the question to “What is the most significant lie?” and not even doing a very good job of it. 

Here’s what I never get: 

  • A name and evidence to support the claim. Not once. Not yet. 

I reached out to a Harvard Ph.D. expert on lying, Dr. Bella DePaulo, to see if she could think of any documented cases that would top Trump. I was worried there might be some famous case of a compulsive liar who had been studied and all his/her lies tallied up by a psychologist. (Dr. DePaulo’s work on Trump has focused not on the quantity of his lies, but on their nature. She’s found he is an exception in another way. Not only does he lie more than anybody, but his lies are exceptionally self-serving and cruel.)

She couldn’t think of anyone who beat him in sheer numbers off the top of her head, either. “I don't know of anyone, but it is possible that such people exist and someone else could point to the evidence,” she said. So let’s find out! Anybody got a name and a citation?

Here’s why this matters: If someone lies to you, they are doing something wrong. We have a basic moral framework, supported by every religion and moral schema, that dictates that people should tell the truth. We make exceptions for “little white lies,” those expressions of polite falsehood that serve as social lubricant. But we all understand that falsehoods undermine relationships, and that too many undermine society itself. If everyone were to lie like Donald Trump, verbal communication itself would simply break down. We’d be living in caves and grunting at one another in a generation or two. We must believe that the people with whom we are communicating are at least making an effort to communicate honestly. If they aren’t, they are harming us. But here’s the thing: If they are harming our relationship by being deceitful, and if we know that, and if we encourage them to continue, we are participating in the harm. And if we know better than to harm ourselves (and that’s a logical leap, I know, but let’s stipulate it), and we continue to do it, we are fools. That’s why one of the myriad ways we describe lies (and for a great read on those, check out Bullshit: A Lexicon by Mark Peters) is to say someone has “made a fool” of you. So as people are making their final voting decisions, and as the rest of us are trying to figure out how to feel about people who support Donald Trump, here’s something we should all be able to agree on: If, as I suspect, Donald Trump has told more lies to the American people than any person ever, and if someone is aware of this contest and follows the results, and if they still decide to vote for Donald Trump, they are a fool. That’s not mean to say. It’s not uncivil. It’s something they are telling you about themselves. If they know about this contest and vote for Trump, they are saying, “I know he makes a fool of me. And I am okay with that because X, Y, Z.” And they may have reasons, even legitimate ones. They aren’t irredeemable or unworthy of engaging in community in the future. They aren’t necessarily an evil person; that’s a separate debate. But they are a fool, self-evidently, almost tautologically. 

And I think that can help us going forward. If we can at least understand that Trump voters are fools, while we can still live together and build a society together, we can all make an informed decision not to allow those people to hold the kinds of positions where their foolishness will continue to cause harm. For example, I would be hard-pressed to imagine a circumstance where I would ever vote for someone I knew supported Trump, and that’s not because I want to punish them for the harm their vote caused, but because I wouldn’t be able to trust them to make good decisions in the future knowing they were fully aware that Trump lied to them more than anyone else and they chose to believe him anyway. What kind of decisions would that person make in a position of power? It’s reasonable to assume they would make foolish ones. Because they have told us they are a fool. (If they were running against someone who I knew would cause terrible harm, I’d certainly consider it. I’m all for strategic voting to produce the best possible outcome. But that’s a separate debate.)

I am excited to see what someone out there can find, or to see how broadly we can spread the word if no alternative answer can be found. 

And please, think carefully about this question when deciding how to vote and how to live with your neighbors after the election. I suspect most people have made up their minds at this point, but regardless, we still have to learn to live with one another on November 4th. Maybe that will be in a country dominated by fools. Maybe it will be in a country where the majority of us have to figure out how to minimize the harm caused by a sizable number of fools. Or maybe it’s just a country where one guy has been foolish and will be forced to admit it and pay somebody. Let’s figure that out together, shall we?


At the Memorial

Will you imagine with me? For just a second?

You are at a memorial service. You are seated near the back because it’s not your usual place of worship, and you didn’t know the individual personally. You chose to come because she was a member of your community. You know she was killed in a horrific way. A plumber came into her home and then attacked her from behind with a wrench, bashing in her skull. The community is horrified. So you chose to come mourn with your neighbors. 

The pastor is speaking about her, but he’s also talking about the injustice of her murder. You are moved to tears. She didn’t deserve this. No one deserves this.

And then the man sitting next to you, an acquaintance who feels overly comfortable talking to you because you’ve met a few times, leans over and says,

“You know, I heard she did something bad when she was young, so she probably did deserve it.”

And

“I have a cousin who is a plumber. I’m not saying this plumber was right, but plumbers are important, so we really need to support plumbers now.”

And

“If she’d just done what the plumber told her to do, he probably wouldn’t have killed her.”

And

“I heard the reason he hit her in the back of the head was because she was running away to get a weapon. So it was really self defense, if you think about it.”

And

“She shouldn’t have been there in the first place.”

And

“I’m not even convinced this really happened. I think this is part of a conspiracy. Have you heard about these secret child sex rings? We should be talking about child sex rings right now.”

And

“This pastor has a weird accent. I don’t think it’s appropriate for a foreigner to be talking about this situation.”

And

“I don’t see why you are so upset. She wasn’t in your family.”

And then he starts to laugh at you. Loudly. Loudly enough that everyone in the sanctuary can hear him. 

What would you think of that person in that moment? Would you have the grace to allow for the possibility that he’s got some severe mental illness? Would you calmly assume that he’s simply misinformed due to the media he consumes? Or would you think that, regardless, his behavior is completely unacceptable? That he is not someone you ever want to associate with again? That there’s a distinct possibility he’s a very bad person?

This kind of behavior, in the flesh-and-blood world, is hard to imagine. It’s like a scene out of a movie, a poorly written drama or a very dark, unfunny satirical comedy. But I have been watching this movie play out online over the last few hours on my social media, and it doesn’t even feel unusual anymore. It feels predictable. Still poorly written, but part of a script we have all seen too many times. 

118391406_10222037759870521_3675886610338587273_o.jpg

The victim, in this case, is not dead. He’s a man named Jacob Blake, and he’s hopefully going to survive. I’m not the praying type, but if there are any gods you believe in, I would ask you to pray to them for some miraculous healing. Jacob Blake wasn’t attacked by a plumber. He was shot seven times in the back by a police officer, Rusten Sheskey. He was shot for being Black. We know this, because since then the police have made it very clear that they do not shoot white people in those circumstances. When Kyle Rittenhouse, a 17 year-old self-appointed militia member, a Blue Lives Matter terrorist who was activated by a diet of Donald Trump rally rhetoric and pro-police propaganda, drove from Illinois to Kenosha, Wisconsin to confront protesters there, his behavior was far more dangerous than Jacob Blake’s, but the police did not shoot him. They did not arrest him. They did not question him. They gave him refreshments and thanked him. He was resisting police orders just as much as Jacob Blake was; there was a curfew in effect the night Rittenhouse arrived. But Blake was killed for refusing to obey, while Rittenhouse was encouraged to continue disobeying. Blake may or may not have been reaching for a weapon. We’ll never know. Even if the Kenosha police tell us they found one in the car, we won’t know if he was reaching for it, and I will remain skeptical that it was ever there in the first place. But we do know he was not holding it, was not brandishing it, was not aiming it at anyone. Rittenhouse was brandishing a semi-automatic rifle which he was not legally allowed to carry. At the very least, that was grounds for arrest. Had he been Black, it would have been a justification for his execution. Yet he was allowed to walk past the police and confront the protesters. Then, when he felt frightened, he killed two and maimed a third. And the police decided, just as quickly as they decided that Jacob Blake was a threat, that Kyle Rittenhouse was a victim, and they let him go home and sleep in his own bed. If a Black man walked into a Trump rally with an AR-15 and then, when confronted by white people in MAGA hats, opened fire and killed two people, does anyone think the Secret Service would hold a press conference the next day in which they would justify letting that man leave the rally on his own recognizance by saying, “An individual was involved in the use of firearms to resolve a conflict”? I write science fiction and fantasy novels, and even I can’t imagine that! So before anyone asks me why I have to make this about race, let me make this clear: The police in Kenosha made this about race. Your refusal to recognize that does not change any of the facts.

When I came across the video of Jacob Blake’s attempted murder on twitter, I was already emotionally raw and vulnerable. Then I learned he had just been breaking up a fight and was returning to the car where his children were seated in the back seats. I imagined my own son when he was younger, still in a car seat, crying because he’d just watched me jump out of the car and break up a fight. As I ran back to him, someone shouted at me to stop, but I could hear my son’s wailing, so I hoped whoever was shouting would just hold on for a second while I consoled on my son. And then I imagined the look on my son’s face while he watched as seven bullets exited through my chest into our family’s car. Make no mistake; that’s the trauma those children experienced. When I pictured the look on my son’s face, I lost it. I choked up, and then I just let myself sob. Yet I knew this would never happen to me. No officer, regardless of his or her skin color, would see a white man running back to check on a crying white child and would presume I was going to get a weapon and attack them. And even if one were feeling offended that I’d ignored their order to freeze, they would not open fire on merely the presumption that I might get a weapon mixed with their irritation at not being respected. I am not expected to show deference in the same way. So I held that tension in my mind as I cried; the horror of the thing I will not experience.

And this should have been the emotional climax of the movie. We white people should all be figuring out how to hold that tension, to imagine ourselves in the places of our Black neighbors while also recognizing that our nation is not colorblind, and we are treated differently. That should get to be the moment that haunts me. But it isn’t. 

Last night I went to a candlelight vigil. There, I saw this wonderful, strong, smart, beautiful Black woman speak. In fact, before I could even see her through the crowd, I could tell Taysha Hartzell is the kind of person this country needs to lift up, to protect, to hear. But this is what she was asking us: “Am I next when the cops come into my house while I'm sleeping and shoot me for no reason? Am I next to be killed while I'm walking on the street, while I'm jogging? Am I next to get shot seven times in the back...while trying to get to my car?" She was pleading. She kept asking why we hate her so much. She kept assuring us that she meant no harm, that people with Black skin have given so much. “We don’t want to destroy this country. We helped build this country!” And she wasn’t speaking softly. She was sobbing and screaming. And all her rhetorical questions about why we, yes, WE, myself included, white people have tolerated a society where Taysha Hartzell has to lay awake at night with a baseball bat next to her bed wondering when police will kick the door down and shoot her for existing-while-Black … this should be the end of the movie. This should be what we sit with while the credits roll. It should be, but it’s not.

This movie is badly written. The plot is poorly constructed. I came home after the vigil and stayed up late into the night reading people, all of them white, telling me all the things which that fictional man leaned over and whispered during the memorial service you imagined. Most of these people weren’t strangers on twitter. They were acquaintances and even friends on Facebook. They blamed Jacob Blake because of crimes he committed as a young man, crimes he likely never would have been charged with or convicted for if he’d been white. They justified their support of Rusten Sheskey’s attempted murder of Jacob Blake by citing their relationships to police officers, or their seemingly principled stance that we should presume innocence until a police officer is convicted in court, a principle they obviously are not willing to extend to someone who is the victim of that officer’s snap judgement. They blamed Jacob Blake for not obeying orders while defending Kyle Rittenhouse’s illegal activities since those might have prevented property damage, clearly revealing their preference for property over the lives of Black people. They extended self defense arguments to Rittenhouse but would not acknowledge that a community might need to defend itself when police are so obviously threatening all of them based on skin color. They blamed protesters for their presence at at unlawful gathering without acknowledging that the people declaring the gathering unlawful have lost legitimacy because of their obvious racial double-standards. They tried to divert attention away with made-up conspiracy theories. And when I posted an article pointing out that America’s uniquely selfish definition of freedom, (freedom for me, not “them”), is behind both our racism and our response to the pandemic, and it’s literally killing us, one staunch defender of American Exceptionalism took issue with the piece on the grounds that the writer is foreign and therefore unfit to point out that we have the highest number of COVID deaths in the world. This is the lingering ending of this bad movie: a bunch of documentary clips of people leaning over during a memorial service to whisper that they don’t care, can’t find it in themselves to care, choose not to care because it frightens them. 

Some part of me, due to the inculcation of my Christian upbringing which dictates that all people are deserving of grace and forgiveness regardless of their willingness to give grace and forgiveness to others, prods me to justify this behavior. On some purely intellectual level, I know Isabel Wilkerson’s thesis in Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents is correct. These individuals are desperately trying to preserve the caste hierarchy because they see any threat to it as a one way ticket lower on that ladder. Even the most mild provocation becomes an existential threat, so a broken window a half a continent away, when combined with the implication that the caste system is unjust, becomes a personal attack, and these people are terrified. On some level they know the hierarchy grinds the people on the bottom to dust, and they feel they must quickly and even violently preserve the system because if they don’t, they assume people will treat them with the same dangerous disdain they daily show to others by not caring when confronted by injustice. When their pastor tells them we are all sinners and must change our ways, they don’t take it personally. Sin nature is inescapable and universal, so why be upset about it? But when someone points out that racism is equally ubiquitous in America, that we are all infected by it, with white people casually accepting dominion and people of color turning that racism inward to accept their own subjugation, most white people cannot tolerate this because the effects of the sin are not equally distributed. The pastor is now saying that the sins of one part of the congregation are hurting other people, while the sins of those other people are hurting themselves, and this pronouncement cannot be tolerated. Now it’s “political.” Now it’s “divisive.” Now it’s “reverse racism.” Now it’s a guilt trip, while being told they were sinners who needed to change was, somehow, not. And so they lash out. They justify any crime committed which serves to preserve the hierarchy, and they blame the victim of any crime rather than challenge the hierarchy. I understand this. I’m white. I feel it, too; this impulse to escape guilt, to refuse to change, to protect what is “mine,” and “earned.” 

So maybe I should extend grace and forgiveness. But another part of me - the same part that saw how Christianity was used by well-intentioned, good people to cause so much harm and insulate itself from the kind of reflection it ostensibly demands - that part recognizes giving grace and offering forgiveness to people leaping to protect the hierarchy maintains the harm done by that hierarchy. Rusten Sheskey, the police officer who shot Jacob Blake seven times in the back, did not wake up on a random Sunday morning, rub his hands together, and say to himself, “Today I’m going to go try to kill a Black man.” He looked in the mirror and saw someone he considered to be a good person doing an important job which helps people. And then, when a Black man didn’t obey him, a clear violation of the hierarchy, he presumed the man was an existential threat and tried to kill him. And the people telling me we should be sticking up for Kyle Rettinhouse and Rusten Sheskey and the racial hierarchy that allows them to still be walking while Jacob Blake may never walk again are committing the exact same error. If I show grace and forgiveness to them, allowing them to be the kinds of people who lean over during a memorial service and laugh at the victim, am I not contributing to the same error? And this error, this little, thoughtless mistake or cowardly decision to remain silent, multiplied by all of us every second of the day, is killing people. 

It’s not just killing the Black men who are disproportionately targeted by police. It’s not just killing the undocumented workers who aren’t given the protections of law because we don’t want to create a humane immigration system for fear it would challenge the racial hierarchy. It’s not just killing Trans women for daring to be themselves, or other LGBTQ people for daring to be themselves, or children who commit the crime of being born to parents suffering from poverty, or women for committing the crime of being women. The caste system isn’t just race, it’s every characteristic we’ve arbitrarily chosen to rank ourselves, and any one of the individuals in any of these groups should be enough reason to question it, but now it’s killing all of us. Do you know about Jared Kushner’s pandemic plan? Way back in March, the White House chose to ignore the comprehensive plan left for them by the Obama Administration, probably out of pure spite. But the President did task someone to create a new plan, namely his completely unqualified son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Kushner ignored all the experts and put together a team of his buddies from college, but what they were doing wasn’t really rocket science; lots of other countries were already implementing plans that were curbing the spread of the Coronavirus, and the plan Kushner’s team put together was, by most accounts, pretty decent. They were all set to reveal it at a big White House Press conference back in early April. And then they got together and decided to shelve it. Why? Because the virus, at that time, was hitting big cities in blue states. They made an intentional decision to preserve their place in the caste hierarchy, specifically to maintain their place at the top. The people who would die would be people lower on the ladder. Big cities have more people of color, more LGBTQ people, more working women who challenge the social order. They would die, their Democratic governors would be blamed by the President, and he would coast to reelection, mostly thanks to his base which most fervently wants to preserve the caste system (Make America Great Again?) but with the additional help of people made acutely anxious by the horror of the disease. This was a conscious choice to do nothing. And I predict they will never be held accountable. They will live out their lives in the lap of luxury, surrounded by people offering fawning adoration, because they are white, they are men, they are rich, and they are powerful. And we have always allowed powerful, rich, white men to decide when our neighbors die. Because we were taught that’s the way it ought to be. And we believed it. 

Of course, now, as the virus spreads most quickly through rural, white, Republican areas, we know this was monumentally stupid as a political strategy. A virus does not target humans based on their political leanings, nor does it observe state boundaries. But the abominable immorality of the calculation is a function of the caste hierarchy. The exact same impulse that makes a dozen white people tell me Jacob Blake should have been shot and Kyle Rittener should be walking free also made a bunch of wealthy, powerful, white males decide that the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans were acceptable losses in the name of preserving their power. We, too, make the conscious choice to do nothing when we see some friend trying to justify racist murders and decide not to start an argument. We let our friends do it. We let our President do it. And “it” is killing us. Is this getting too “political”? Too “divisive”? 


I did not go to a memorial service for Jacob Blake last night. I returned from a vigil for him, and I came home to a memorial for the hundreds of thousands of people who are currently being killed by our desperate need to maintain the hierarchy. I honestly don’t know how to relate to the people sitting around me at this service. I can block and unfriend the worst, of course, but that’s not a strategy for living in community with other people. A community is founded on some bare minimum level of mutual respect. I want to be able to say, “Happy birthday!” to everyone I know once a year. I want to be able to smile and greet my neighbors as I walk the dog. I want to be able to cry, shoulder to shoulder, with all my fellow Americans when any one of us is murdered by our own government, whether through a police officer’s pistol or an unqualified, immoral bureaucrat's choice to withhold the kind of healthcare poorer countries offer for free. I want to maintain my prejudice that everyone I meet exhibits basic human decency. I want to love my neighbor. But how can I, Dear Reader? Please tell me, how do I respect people making excuses for racist murder? How do I engage politely in the future, as though I never witnessed their reaction over the last few days? Am I the one who is being uncivil when I turn to the person next to me in the pew and hiss through gritted teeth, “You are at a funeral. Act like it!”?

Confession

Confession

I had a really hard time finding the motivation to come out to protest. It's hot, and I was just tired. And I know there are people who have a lot more right to exhaustion than I do. The organizers and so many of the protesters in Portland have been out every night since the murder of George Floyd. In my own community, Carol and the core crew of allies have been out protesting every single day for months, too. And beyond that, the people on whose behalf we are all protesting have endured the oppression we're protesting for 401 years. I don't think I have any right to be tired. But I was. I am. 

And then I had two conversations that inspired me. I got a message from the parent (shout out to Haley) of some former students who attended the high school where I teach. She had come across some folks proclaiming racism doesn't exist and Black Lives Matter is just a Marxist organization. I seriously doubt they know enough about Marxism to understand that anti-capitalism is a part of Black Lives Matter because our late-stage-crony-capitalist system is particularly unjust to people of color. I'll bet they just think "Marxist=Bad." Similarly, I'd bet they've not reflected on the fact that a couple of white people discussing the way they have decided racism doesn't exist and all people of color saying it does are wrong is, itself, proof of their white supremacist thinking. But then I was talking with another friend (shout out to Ally) about how to communicate with anti-maskers, and I admitted I have no idea. Furthermore, I suspect that I'm pretty easy to dismiss for a lot of reasons. It was a reminder of an important distinction I learned a long time ago but am still absorbing: A movement needs organizers and mobilizers. Organizers are people like my friends Ally, Sandra, Joanna, and Mike who can reach out to people who don't agree, meet them where they are, and welcome them patiently into a movement. Mobilizers are people like me who preach to the choir, get folks who already agree activated to get off their couches and hold a sign or cast a vote or call a representative. Organizers are more important. Without organizers, mobilizers don't have anyone to mobilize. But a movement needs both. I'm not going to persuade anyone, but I can do my part, too. So I got my sign and hit the streets. And I'm so glad I did.

Here's something I think a lot of folks don't understand about protesting; it's not about changing the minds of people who disagree. Have you ever seen someone holding a sign and flipped your position on an issue? No? Neither has anyone else. Mostly it's about letting people who agree know that they aren't alone and, when we stand together, we have the ability to make changes. It also puts pressure on political leaders who say, "Whoa! I guess I'd better move this up the priority list." But here's a third thing that a lot of folx miss: It's also about the protester. It changes us. When we march and chant, we renew our commitment to act. Speakers who share enlighten us. And when we stand with signs, it gives us time to reflect and process. As one of the organizers in Portland said, the protesters there have taken the space in front of the justice center and have turned it into a university. The protesters are hearing lectures, receiving assigned reading, bonding around a shared identity, and thinking through the way their new learning will change them as they walk around in the world when they leave that school. 

So come join us sometime if you're able. It's good for you, too! It sure was for me today. 

20200802_193502.jpg

The Amnesiac

The Amnesiac

a short story by Benjamin Gorman

care-hospital-room-bed-preview.jpg

He stepped up to the podium, remembered not to tap the mic, and spoke.

“Is this on? Can everyone hear me okay?” 

He was clearly nervous, but the crowd was generous. They lowered their signs. The sun was beating down on them. They had just been chanting loudly, so his speech was giving them a break but also sucking the energy out of the moment. A few people flashed him thumbs up, and someone in the back cried out, “You got this!” to gentle laughter.

“Good, because this is going to require a little audience participation. The last time I spoke to all of you, I was asked to do it on the fly, and I wished I’d had something prepared-”

“You were great!” the same voice from the back called out. 

“Great” is too kind, he thought, but it would have been insulting if she’d said “fine” or “sufficient” or “meh,” so he appreciated her choice. 

“Well, thank you. As some of you know, I write novels. I thought I would take this opportunity to share a story with you that’s just an outline right now, and you can tell me if it works, and give me some feedback about how you would like it to end. Would you all help me with that?”

Lots of nods. Even some “Woohoo”s, but they were cautious ones. Good, he thought. Normally he would have been bothered by the way they had gone quiet, but they were listening intently.

“The story starts with a guy in a hospital bed. Mid-thirties. He looks strong and healthy, but he’s just waking up, and he’s dazed. He doesn’t know where he is. He looks over, and there’s another man in the room, a guy about his age snoozing in a chair. 

“The snoozing man wakes up and is pleased to see the man in the bed, but the guy in the bed has no idea who the other man is. 

“‘I’m your oldest friend,’ the man says. ‘My name is…”

The writer at the podium smiled and shrugged. “And I don’t quite know what their names are yet. I have some ideas, but for now let’s call the friend ‘W.’  W not only introduces himself to the man in the hospital bed; he starts to tell the man who he is, too. ‘You were in a terrible car accident. They had to put you in a medically induced coma. Your body has healed, but even before they put you under, we knew you’d lost your memory. You didn’t recognize any of us. Your name is-”

The writer laughed a little. “I don’t have a name for him, either. For now we’ll call him ‘A.’ So W has to fill A in on who A is. He tells him that A is this great guy, and everyone has been rooting for him and worried about him. W points around the room, and there are all these bouquets of flowers, obviously expensive ones. ‘You are very loved,’ W says. ‘You are a powerful person. You own a business and have employees who look up to you. You’re a pillar of the community. You served your country in the military back before you started your business, and you served honorably, and everyone respects you for that. You’re married, and…”

The writer paused because W pauses here in a noticeable way. “‘You don’t have kids of your own, but you have nieces and nephews who love you. Your sisters are going to come in over the next few days now that you’re awake, and they’ll bring their kids so you can meet them all over again. We’ve talked about how this is going to take some time, and I know it’s difficult, but we’re going to look on the bright side and try to enjoy filling you in on who you are, okay? We’ll make it fun. Because you are a great guy, A, and all of us who love you are looking forward to telling you that.’”

The writer looked up from his rough notes. “So, at this point, the reader really likes both these guys, right? We feel sorry for A, but we’re glad he has this good friend who’s clearly a thoughtful and caring person helping him readjust to the world.

“And then A’s wife comes into the room, and her behavior is really weird. Let’s call her ‘U.’” The writer chuckled. “Saying that out loud sounds strange. ‘U’ the letter, not Y-O-U.” There were a few laughs. “And not E-W-E. She’s not a sheep.” More laughter. “So U comes in and she doesn’t run over and kiss him or take his hand. She stands back away from the bed at a distance. She looks at the ground. She’s very apologetic. She says she knows he can’t understand this, but she needs him to sign some documents to get their divorce processed. She’s been waiting for him to wake up so she could get this done, but they were working on getting a divorce even before the accident. She’s really sorry this has to be his first experience with her, she says, but she’s decided it will be easier for them both if he just signs the paperwork and she walks out of his life. That way he can figure out who he is without her around to complicate things at all.

“And A doesn’t know how to respond to this. He looks to W, and he sees W is red-in-the face pissed. W looks at A, his jaw clenched, and speaks in this pinched, voice, like he’s trying not to shout. ‘I recommend you don’t sign anything just yet.’ W looks at U. ‘We told you not to do it this way. Why are you doing this?’

U wouldn’t go near A, but she takes a step closer to W, stares hard at him, and says, “Fuck. You.’ And then she storms out without even looking at A again. 

The writer held up his hands. “Sorry about the f-bomb, kids. Characters in stories don’t always use polite language. Your parents can take that up with them.” This got a laugh, mostly of relief. “At this point, what do we think of U? She seems pretty terrible, right? The reader won’t like her very much. And this will be compounded when W explains to A that U is a terrible person. She used to be nice, back when A and U got married, but she’s become lazy and entitled since A’s business got so successful and they got rich. And that’s why W didn’t want him to sign any paperwork just yet. A will have to deal with it eventually, but according to W, U is trying to take everything she can away from A, so A really needs to learn who he is, talk it all over with his lawyers, and figure the divorce out later. W waves a dismissive hand towards the door. ‘She’s waited this long. She can wait a little longer until you’re back on your feet.’

“Then the story speeds up. A checks out of the hospital, and W drives him back to his house. U has already moved out, so A has the house to himself, and it’s a mansion. Clearly he’s done very well for himself financially. But right away there are pieces of W’s story that aren’t fitting. There are two children’s rooms, complete with toys and kids’ decorations, but W said he had no kids. And then he goes into work, and there’s applause when he arrives, but he can feel a lack of warmth and see a lot of sideways glances from the employees. He talks to one of the senior managers, an older guy named B, about this, and B says that A was a ruthless boss, and that’s exactly why the upper management respected him so much. A always played hardball. He smashed two attempts by the employees to form a union, firing the people who were calling for it under the pretext that they were bad employees since it’s illegal to fire them for trying to form a union. That allowed A to keep wages as low as possible and maximise profits, which B completely agreed with and admired. A takes this in and struggles with it. Hadn’t W said he was loved? He’d said that his employees looked up to him, but was it out of fear? A doesn’t want to be that kind of person. 

“So A starts looking into the company more deeply, and as he pours over internal documents, he finds out that the business is rotten to the core. They’ve been knowingly polluting the local river and keeping it a secret. Even worse, the product they make harms the customers who buy it. And he was cheating on his taxes, cheating his investors, cheating his suppliers, and lobbying local officials, bribing the corrupt ones and blackmailing the honest ones, to make sure a lot of his cheating was becoming legal. A realized he had a chance to start over, but he wasn’t even sure where to start. He would have to come up with a new product, safer supply chains, better treatment of workers, everything. It would be so much easier to just continue as though nothing had changed. But he didn’t want to be his old self.  He could be a kinder boss now. He could be a better corporate citizen. He had a chance to reinvent himself.”

The writer smiled, but it was a sad smile. “At this point the reader thinks this is going to be one of those stories where the guy gets turned into a snowman or a dog or a child or whatever, reevaluates his life, and suddenly becomes a decent person. But she’ll notice we’re a bit early in the story for that big turning point. It’s going to get worse before it gets better, folks.” 

Some nods and a bit of  laughter from the crowd, now rueful.

“Once A starts going through his phone messages and his emails, he learns he used to cheat on his wife all the time. And when he dumped those women, he was terrible to them, too, threatening them with different kinds of harm if they ever told U about their affairs. As he reads the threats, he gets more and more horrified by who he used to be. He decides he doesn’t want to know. He just wants to start over. Those things are in the past, and he’s a different person now. He gives up on the project of learning about his old life. That was before. This is now. That’s all he needs to know.

“And I think the reader will sympathize with that. We’re still on A’s side, despite the kind of person he used to be, right?” The writer looked at the faces in the crowd. Some nodded, but their smiles were gone. They could feel it coming, though they didn’t know what “it” was yet.

“And then a woman comes to his house. Her name is … well, let’s call her “P” for now. When he opens the door, she asks to come in, and he’s immediately attracted to her. And then she explains that she’s one of the women he cheated with. He feels guilty, not just about the affair back before the accident, but about his response in the moment, because the first thing he thinks is that he can understand why he cheated with this woman. Not only is she significantly more physically attractive than U…”

The writer looked up at the crowd. “Not more attractive than Y-O-U. More attractive than his wife.” The crowd laughed.

“Not only is P more attractive than his wife, but she carries herself with a confidence that’s compelling, and her smile is kind, far kinder than he deserves, he realizes. She explains she heard all about his accident and amnesia, and she decided she wanted to come talk to him as part of her own healing. She feels very guilty about their affair. She tells him she loved him deeply, and that was why she allowed him to treat her the way he did. He was physically abusive to her, she says, though not at first. Slowly he got worse and worse, and he did it because he was used to it. He’d spent so many years abusing his wife, U, that he just slipped into the same pattern of abuse with P as well. And the abuse wasn’t just physical.”

The author stopped. “I won’t get too graphic because I know there are children here, but I think I have to use the R word because it’s essential to the story.” No one moved. No one covered their children’s ears or took their kids away. “Okay,” the author continued, “then P explains that he raped her because he frequently raped his wife U, and when P tried to get out of the relationship, he not only beat her more, but the emotional abuse ramped up so he could keep her feeling like a possession but also keep her quiet.

“And A is horrified by all of this. He gets really defensive, at first trying to explain that he is not that person anymore. She says she knows that, but she feels he needs to know who he was. He gets even more scared and angry and starts telling her that maybe he shouldn’t believe her. Maybe she’s a liar. And then he settles on that theory, firmly accusing her of trying to trick him. She persists. He steps towards her, all his muscles clenched, thinking he’s going to demand she leave his house or maybe he’s going to throw her out or maybe …” The writer looked down at his own balled fists. He paused. The crowd was completely silent. Someone coughed, whispered an apology, and even that could be heard.  “And in that moment,” the writer continued, “he realizes she’s right. She is telling the truth. He really was the kind of person who could do such horrible things because he’s displaying it right now. He begins to weep. She steps towards him and pulls his head down into the crook of her neck, not a romantic gesture but an expression of pure comfort. And she tells him that it’s taken her a lot of hard work to not be scared of him anymore, but she’s there now, and she really believes if he confronts this, all of this, the absolute worst of it, he can choose to be a better person. But he has to push himself, she says. He has to be willing to really open his eyes. 

“So he decides to do that, and he contacts U and tells her he needs to know everything, and he’ll sign whatever she needs him to sign. He tells her he is willing to meet wherever she feels comfortable, and that lets her know he’s at least aware of some of what he did. She agrees to meet with him at a bench between the courthouse and the police station where she will feel safe. 

“And when they meet, he starts by apologizing for all the things he’s learned about. And, to his amazement, she tells him some part of her really does want to get back together. She loves him and wants to work it out. Or she wishes she could. She used to love him, anyway. She’s not sure. She needs him to understand that it’s worse than he knows. ‘I know you aren’t … him, anymore. But that doesn’t erase what he did,’ she says. ‘A, the accident that caused your amnesia? It wasn’t your first car accident. It was your second. When they found you after the second accident, the tox screen showed you were drunk and high. You were trying to forget. Because you didn’t want to remember the first accident. It was just you and our two girls in the car, and that time you were sober, but you turned around in your seat to hit one of the kids. You never told me which one. Maybe you weren’t sure. Maybe both of them. And when you turned, you must have twisted the wheel, and the car flipped, and…’ And U is looking down at her hands in her lap, and they’re shaking, and A wants to take her hands but he’s afraid to touch her now, afraid of himself and her reaction to the man who murdered her children, and … “

The writer looked up quickly, then slowly scanned the crowd. “And that’s all I’ve got so far. I’m not sure how it ends. So one thing I do when I get stuck in a plot like this is take some time to think about who the characters are, and then I let them guide me and tell me what they do next. So let’s go back to those ideas about their names.

“I think I’m going to call A “America.” It’s perfect for him. A lot of people don’t even know where the name “America” comes from. It’s not a Native American word. It doesn’t come from any of the people of the nations who were already in America. It doesn’t come from the British who landed in Plymouth or Jamestown. It’s not from the Spanish who conquered Florida. No, it comes from an Italian map maker. I guess he decided if he was making the map, he could put his name on there, so, like our character, America doesn’t have a real connection with America. So that seems like the right name.

“And U is the people of the United States. She has suffered so much at America’s hands. The beatings. The rape. The murder of her children. And she’s all of us. She is the Native people who had their land stolen, their culture stolen, their languages stolen, their bodies raped, their children killed. She is the Black citizens who had their bodies stolen, their basic humanity unrecognized. She is the women who have always been treated as less worthy, their rights dribbled to them one at a time, each new right presented as though it should be enough. She is the immigrants who came from all over the world and were told they would find freedom and opportunity only to find themselves in one of the least equal nations on Earth, and then told the only way for them to get ahead here was to take part in burning the bridges behind them, mistreating the next immigrant to be more accepted by the ones who came before. She is the white worker who is told she has to be afraid of every person of color who wants to take her job, take her house, rape her, and kill her, so she needs to keep them down in every way she can. And yes, she is even the most wealthy billion-heir who is also miserable because she’s been told she has to work a hundred and fifty hours a week clawing her way up the corporate ladder and stepping on everyone beneath her or she’ll lose everything. That sense of constant desperation and dread, in a country so wealthy that no one ever needs to feel it or hurt anyone to have their basic needs met? That’s her. That’s United States.

“And W is White Supremacy and Patriarchy. He does what he’s always done. He tells America that he’s great, not because that helps America. It’s clearly not helping him repair his marriage. No, White Supremacy and Patriarchy tells America that he’s great because keeping America ignorant of who he is preserves, protects, and promotes White Supremacy and Patriarchy. White Supremacy and Patriarchy doesn’t serve white people. He doesn’t serve men. White Supremacy and Patriarchy lies to everyone and harms everyone to protect himself. 

B, of course, is Business. Business admires ruthlessness and appreciates profit because, in our system, he’s literally, legally not allowed to care about anything else other than maximizing his shareholder’s returns. He doesn’t have to be that way. He’s not in other countries, But here, Business is legally obligated.

“And what about P? P is Protesters. She’s you. Y-O-U this time. Protesters love America, and she also feels guilty about that love. Once she did the work to get over her own abuse, she could see America for what he was. But she loves him anyway and wants him to be better. She is the one who conquers her fear so she can hold America up and tell him he needs to know his past even when he doesn’t want to.”

Then the writer looked down and shook his head. “But I still don’t know how it ends. Even after Protesters tell America he needs to learn the truth about what he has done, what he has created, the situation in which he still finds himself, and even after he decides he wants to be better, how does he possibly reconcile with United States? How do they become The United States of America after everything she has gone through? Once he knows, how can he even dare to ask to make The United States of America whole? How can he expect her, after everything she’s suffered, to ever trust him again? I don’t know how this story ends.”

“Therapy!” someone yelled. It took everyone by surprise, and a ripple of laughter spread through the crowd. 

“Truth and reconciliation commissions!” someone else yelled.

“Reparations!” someone added, and that got a smattering of “Yeah!”s and “Amen!”s.

The writer smiled. “I agree, but long therapy sessions aren’t a fun ending to a book. They’re just hard work. Seriously, though, I recognize that I will have to come up with fictional names. I know my writing is never subtle, but this is some Pilgrim’s Progress level didacticism. I can change the names so it’s not so heavy-handed; the reader will get the metaphor, right?”

Then he pointed at the counter-protesters on the other side of the lawn, the ones wearing and waving a mixture of American flags and the flags of countries the United States defeated in wars. “I just want us all to remember the sympathy we felt before we knew America’s name. He didn’t know his own history at first. And then he didn’t want to know, and we still felt for him. He got defensive and even dangerous because he didn’t want to know his own history, and we all understood. This is hard stuff to know. It’s a lot to carry. The reader will get that, right?”

He inflected as though the question was rhetorical, but a woman in the front surprised him. “No,” the protester said. “Keep the names. They won’t see it because they won’t want to see it. We’re all here because we know we have to tell them.”